What I dont understand is this:
if the license is not good enough for osm, why is it not good enough for
wikipedia?
If the license is broken, why dont the authors of the license fix it so all
projects benefit.
it is all confusing for me.
mike
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kai Krueger
<kakrueger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for all the questions, but I was curious to
hear how people see
the current status and its future. If there are any wiki pages, talks or
other material about the current status of the OSM wikipedia integration
I'd be thankful for any further links as well.
I'm curious too. Has there been any discussion of how the change in
OSM license will affect integration? Are there any Wikipedia ---> OSM
information-sharing scripts that may break as a result?
SJ
_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
Maps-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania
flossk.org
flossal.org