Do you really mean checking the most-used messages (as
we normally let the
content on incubator be checked)?
Am 28.09.2013 18:58 schrieb "Carlos Manuel Colina" <
jewbask(a)wikimedia.org.ve>gt;:
+1 if we could get an expert in Votic to
double-check the most-used
messages at least
El 28/09/2013 07:37 p.m., MF-Warburg escribió:
Hi all,
I propose to approve Votic Wikipedia (vot).
Meta request:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Votic
Test wiki:
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/vot
Activity:
http://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/catanalysis/?cat=0&title=Wp/vot&…
at least 3 users with >10 edits since 5 months, and also previous
such activity in 2012).
Translation of the most-used messages is complete (<
http://toolserver.org/~robin/?tool=codelookup&code=vot>)ot>).
As this would be the first project in Votic, we also would need an
expert to verify the content.
(By the way, verification for Livonian is still pending - my attempts
to contact people were unsuccesful).
Best regards,
MF-Warburg
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing
listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
"*Jülüjain wane mmakat* ein kapülain tü alijunakalirua jee wayuukanairua
junain ekerolaa alümüin supüshuwayale etijaanaka. Ayatashi waya junain."
Carlos Manuel Colina
Vicepresidente
A.C. Wikimedia Venezuela
RIF J-40129321-2
+972-52-4869915
www.wikimedia.org.ve
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org