The proposal exactly is that the eligibility of such
languages should be
decided by a (simple majority) vote. Or do I misunderstand the objection?
2017-05-19 3:32 GMT+02:00 Michael Everson <everson(a)evertype.com>om>:
I agree with Gerard. A primary code in BPC 47
would be a rarity, and not
something to be adopted here without a proper vote.
Michael Everson
On 19 May 2017, at 01:24, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I do not support the Notion of a simple majority When there is no
ISO639 3. I want
arguments and eventualy a vote.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op vr 19 mei 2017 om 01:08 schreef MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com
Forgot one important point:
:''Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a
valid BCP 47 code.''
This would be a novelty.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org