Am So., 18. Okt. 2020 um 17:53 Uhr schrieb Mohammad Mogoei <
m.mogoei(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Dear members of committee
We've answered all questions that Amir asked by firm documents and
references. But now we see Amir is trying to change the topic into renaming
the
lrc.wikipedia.com to
lki.wikipedia.com! It's clear that this claim is
absolutely wrong because Luri is different from Laki and these two are not
the same. At the end, we expect you reject Amir's proposal about Luri
Wikipedia according to our clear answers and references.
Well, no. Amir is not "trying to change the topic into renaming
lrc.wikipedia.com to lki.wikipedia.com". Please address the actual
questions that were raised about the content and the identification of the
language. It is not sufficient to say "we gave clear answers and
references" when all you say is ...
Considering that Amir Sarabadani's mother tongue
is not Luri and Laki is
different from Northen Luri and the difference between the two is quite
clear and that he is not able to write and read in Northen Luri so he is
not able to make the claim they mentioned in their email. , And there is no
need to move or do anything else.
...that Amir's points are invalid because he is not lrc-N / lki-N /
whatever language this really is - N.
Luri Wikipedia has been the result of the efforts of
young people who have
no formal or informal educational media to write in Luri in Iran for almost
ten years from the time it was created until today, and these young people
want to continue working and writing in Luri.
Previously your claim was that Luri Wikipedia is written and / or backed by
some brilliant "linguists and professors", who produced "calligraphy
training books", now it's only some poor students who are barely literate?
Come on.