It also gives a good argument for admins actually applying semi-protection
properly. BLPs under attack should always have a LONG semi-protection that
can be shortened if it is determined the risk is abated. I was fairly
flabbergasted to see a very brief SP applied when it was obvious there was
a serious external campaign happening.
Risker/Anne
On 15 June 2012 15:54, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This case presents a good argument for flagged
revisions. Given that the
people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and
changes would have been visible to the public.
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, <koltzenburg(a)w4w.net> wrote:
Hi Gillian,
thank you for this information
do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list
might take, in this case as well as
generally?
open for suggestions,
Claudia
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote
Hi All,
The Community is aware of this and is discussing it. However, it's
worthwhile bringing to the attention of this list that one woman's
efforts
at studying gender stereotyping (reported in The
New
Statesman<
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/06/dear-internet-
why-you-cant-have-anything-nice>) have
resulted in massive and nasty
vandalism of Anita Sarkeesian's page on Wikipedia <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian>gt;.
Gillian
thanks & cheers,
Claudia
koltzenburg(a)w4w.net
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap