As far as I remember the "nake-hub" of commons (As i call it) has no
problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of
commons, the "puritans" (several here in that list) who cant see a naked
picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay
or lesbian one.
PS.: I just don't do the draw myself because I don't have the skills to do
it.
_____
*Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
On 29 April 2012 21:19, Michelle Gallaway <mgallaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is a great idea. We'll see if the bleating
that the image is
"educational" is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net
wrote:
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. >:)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on
male. Go for it!
As for female "ejaculation" since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I
don't think women do it.
Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides "get wet." And
maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's
ejaculation. But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if
there are any!!
CM
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap