Hi again,
thanx for all your answers.
So I come to think about my own attitude towards this topic and yeah: maybe you are right.
I should learn to more "think like wikipedia" at this point.
it feels like a disappointment at first. but I try to understand.
(although in my view this is no "illustration", but a comic. but that is just a
very small difference.)
Yours
Katrin
Frau Lila
http://katrin-roenicke.de
Am 27.04.2012 um 21:28 schrieb "Carol Moore DC"
<carolmooredc@verizon.net<mailto:carolmooredc@verizon.net>>:
NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with bushier eyebrows and a goatee and put that
up instead :-)
On 4/27/2012 1:50 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
Katrin, I hate to be captain obvious here, but: Do you know that "cun shot" is a
porn related term right? Only used in Porn related articles (see related
articles<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Cum_shot>… And that
what is in the article isn't a picture, but a illustration?
I do agreed when people complained about the naked gardening article and pic, because
isn't a sex related article. But this IS a sex related article, not only, this one is
a PORN related article. Is not like someone will fall there accidentally by looking for
Jesus or Santa. Therefore, I don't see the reason to censor the article.
____
Béria Lima
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap