Makes sense. A more useful test would be a two-parter; for a male to expand
on the current (biased) information, and for a clearly female editor to
insert new, female-perspective information. That way we can see not only if
there's a noticeable difference in how people treat the schools of thought,
but if there's a noticeable difference in how they treat editors.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Frances Kissling <fkissling(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Good point, Oliver. I actually have no idea why there
is no mention of the
gender dimensions of Liberation Theology or if my women colleagues have
tried to put any in. Perhaps this would be a good first test for me- to add
a section on Women and Liberation Theology and see what happens.
Frances Kissling, visiting scholar
Center for Bioethics, UPenn
202 368 3954
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap