Significantly less likely than men who don't attend such training..........
So does that mean the targeting is correct and the people sent on such training are
disproportionately those who most need it?
If you want a test of how effective that training is you could try an AB test. Study a
large group of attendees, half before and half after such training. Or a large group of
men a few months before and after such training to see if those who attend make more
progress than those who don't. Comparing those who don't attend with those who do
would only make sense if the attendees were randomly chosen.
WereSpielChequers
On 3 May 2016, at 15:53, Neotarf
<neotarf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"A study in the Journal of Applied Behavioral Science found men who participated in
a university staff sexual harassment programme were “significantly less likely” to see
coercive behaviour as sexual harassment."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/work/sexual-harassment-training-makes-men-…
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap