Today I proposed a product plan [1] for Event Tool based on the two Sept. 6 metrics
posts—here [2] and here [3]—that I brought to this list a few weeks ago. The proposed
program of work is designed to turn Grant Metrics into a simple but capable tool that will
meet the metics needs of most event organizers—a “one-stop shop,” as one organizer called
it, for getting the data that many organizers now laboriously assemble from multiple
sources.
I’ve called the project laid out in the two posts reference above “ambitious but
achievable,” and I think that’s a good description. Now it’s your turn again: does this
direction look right? Is there anything we can add that would make it work better for you?
And—since it’s possible we won’t get to everything—are there any features here you think
we could drop or put on our low-priority list? If you have ideas or questions, now is the
time to bring them forward. We’re listening!
[1] Sept. 19, 2018: Proposing a product plan for ‘Event Tool’
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Tech/Tools_for_program_and_event_…
[2] Sept. 6, 2018: Proposed metrics features—what do you think?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Tech/Tools_for_program_and_event_…
[3] Sept. 6, 2018 (continued): New data and reports in detail
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Tech/Tools_for_program_and_event_…
________________
Joe Matazzoni
Product Manager, Community Tech
Wikimedia Foundation