exactly. I think that we might be doing too much in the way of a value
judgement. I consider a red ink a todo list, or request, not "something
wrong" I know the opinions vary here but I'd rather us not swing too far
into associating an emotion or value judgment on red links.
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation
M +1 415 609 4043 \\ @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:04 PM, max <max(a)koehler-kn.de> wrote:
@jared:
I've got two points.
1. Hover isn't a thing we can rely on. Even desktop computers have touch
screens now.
2.The colour red usually means that something's wrong (in our case: a page
doesn't exist yet), and so does the "!" icon. "Dotted Underline"
on the
other hand has no meaning to it, it's super abstract. Users would have to
learn what it means by trial and error.
-best,
max
@awesomephant
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design