The only difference is that Cyrillic is selected by default.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I didn't actually try to run it, but is the user
interface here
different from Serbian and Kazakh etc.?
The design principles are probably the same for all the languages that
need this feature and can be discussed and tested generally.
--
Amir
2012/12/23 Soslan Khubulov <soslanx(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi all!
I am writing an extension for Karachay Wikipedia. The extension gives
users
option to convert the page from Cyrillic to
Latin. The discussion about
it
is here:
https://krc.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия:Конвертер
The design is very simple and is similar to Serbian Converter. There is a
switcher which have two options: Cyrillic and Latin. If user choses
Latin he
gets converted page. Cyrillic is by default.
The development is on GitHub.
https://github.com/soslan/KB-Cyrl2Latn-Converter It is not finished
yet. I
am going to add corresponding option to User
Settings and switch to HTML
parser. Currently it uses regex to determine what to translate.
What do you think about user experience?
Thanks,
Soslan Khubulov
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design