talk:Check-usage.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');
to monobook.js, it seems better than including it in order to have always an
updated version, and the script can be hosted outside commons if needed. ¿Is
MediaWiki talk:Check-usage.js world-writable? If so, thet it is a security
flaw, but you can always host it in a more secure place.
Barcex
2007/5/12, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>om>:
OK, I put it under [[MediaWiki talk:Check-usage.js]]. You can try it
out by putting
{{subst:MediaWiki talk:Check-usage.js}}
in your [[/monobook.js]]. It is currently checking all wikipedias and
wikinews. For wikibooks, it uses the same languages as for wikinews.
This amounts to >300 sites to check, so it will take about 20 sec to
complete, depending on your computer and internet connection.
Magnus
On 5/11/07, Ayelie <ayelie.at.large(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/11/07, Magnus Manske
<magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Gladly. Alas, I'm not an admin, so I can't edit the MediaWiki
namespace
:-(
Should I apply for admin rights for technical purposes only?
Magnus
Going through an RfA will take a week, so it is probably quicker for now
to
go through normal means. For translations users
usually post the
requested
edits on the talk page of the mediawiki page in
question, and then add
{{editprotected}} to the talk page. An administrator will come and move
your
content to the mediawiki page for you.
Cheers :)
--
Ayelie
~Editor at Large
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l