On 7/14/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/14/07, Samuli Lintula
<samuli(a)samulilintula.net> wrote:
BTW, why is it
that requiring attribution (an inelianable moral right) is
considered free while requiring other inalienable moral rights is unfree?
Because it doesn't really place restictions on what you can do with the work
I believe you are completely mistaken. The way *i* understand it, the
CC 3.0 licence simply states clearly in the text of the licence rights
that exist and can't be waived in those countries where they exist
anyway.
In clear, the licence does not *add* any restriction that is not there
in the first place.
Delphine
--
~notafish
NB. This address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.