If I understand correctly, every mirror that uses ads (like
http://pedia.walla.co.il for he) is commercial usage, so NC/ND is not
practical even now...
Nadav
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Benbennick" <dbenbenn(a)gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Commons Discussion List" <commons-l(a)wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] justifying the "no NC/ND" requirement
On 4/3/06, Brianna Laugher
<brianna.laugher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have a really succint, persuasive
argument for this?
I usually point out that
Ask.com is ''already'' using Wikipedia and
Commons content for commercial purposes. For example, the top of
http://www.ask.com/web?q=Petersen+graph shows an image from the
Commons.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l