Yes. As the chairman of CC I would disagree that 3.0 is non-free. ;-)
On Jul 14, 2007, at 1:33 JST, Jimmy Wales wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:18 AM, geni wrote:
We have no control over what Creative commons put
up in their
webspace. We currently regard the CC 3.0 series of licences as non
free because of the way they handle moral rights. Obviously Creative
commons dissagree.
It is more accurate to say that "some people regard CC 3.0 licenses
as non free".
In my opinion, people think that only because they do not understand
the moral rights issues.
Please don't use the royal we to refer to your own opinions. :)
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l