Hi Christian,
thanks for starting this thread. I believe the discussion is too important to be held on a
mailing list and I suggest we start a wiki page discussing pros and cons of different
proposals.
I have my own list of concerns with the canonical TAE definition (issues with how we
define content namespaces, countable pages and the discounting of activity on deleted
pages, lack of metrics focused on registration date) which I'd like to discuss. Since
we're having this conversation I'd rather have it in a place where we can assess
the strength of each proposal. How does that sound?
We also have stubs for user class definitions here [1] and it'd be great to start
revamping that page.
Dario
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Metrics#User_classes
On Sep 25, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Erik Zachte <ezachte(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Someday people will want edits by the hour, broken
down by country and age group ;-)
Seriously too much granularity can makes us focus on noise rather than trends.
In the report card since we changed from 1 to 3 years as default charting period, we
spend less time overanalyzing relatively small outliers.
We could determine 'normalized' daily counts by calculating for historic months
ratio (monthly 5+)/(avg daily 1+),
and scaling daily counts with this factor but it feels a bit artificial to me.
The alternative is either unscaled 1+ or 5+, and emphasize daily and monthly counts are
not related.
Same issue we have with daily vs monthly unique visitors (from comScore). We chose to
ignore daily UV's.
Erik
-----Original Message-----
From: analytics-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:analytics-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Christian Aistleitner
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:36 PM
To: analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Analytics] "Active editor" for a given day (instead of month)
Hi,
our current definiton of „active editor” [1]:
An 'active editor' is a registered (and signed in) person (not known
as a bot) who makes 5 or more edits in any month in mainspace on
countable pages.
is centered around months. That's good.
However, as we are seeing requests to produce daily graphs: How to interpret the above
definition in terms of active editors for a given /day/?
Especially: How to do it in a way that blends nicely with the current month-based
definition?
Best regards,
Christian
P.S.: I've seen code in our repos that just looks for edits of the last 30 days. That
sounds nice. But if I am doing 3 edits on 2013-07-01, and another 3 on 2013-07-31, I would
not be considered active editor by this daily approach for any day. However, I'd be an
active editor for July using [1] :-/
[1]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Metric_definitions#Active_editor
--
---- quelltextlich e.U. ---- \\ ---- Christian Aistleitner ----
Companies' registry: 360296y in Linz Christian Aistleitner
Gruendbergstrasze 65a Email: christian(a)quelltextlich.at
4040 Linz, Austria Phone: +43 732 / 26 95 63
Fax: +43 732 / 26 95 63
Homepage:
http://quelltextlich.at/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics