No subject


Wed Apr 18 14:20:01 UTC 2007


makes sense when there is at least a link to the word in the base language.
When the initial creation of stubs is followed by the enrichment of these
stubs it is acceptable. For having information that is completely wrong,
there is no excuse.

The question is, will there be a discussion about acceptable practices in
Wiktionary. The question are:

   - Can the Polish demand what they do?
   - Is having a project that consists mainly of stubs acceptable?
   - Is having incorrect data acceptable?

Thanks,
GerardM

PS I copied this from my blog.


More information about the Wiktionary-l mailing list