On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm in favor of option (C), mainly because I think
that titles are pointless
and
lead to hat collecting and hurt feelings. I respect Brion, Mark and Tim (and
many others) as architects because they *are* architects, not because we
call them such.
+1. The respect they have is not because of them being labeled
Architects, but quite the inverse.
For RFCs, I've been of the opinion we've made
them entirely too formal. I'm
glad we're trying to move them forward, but I've always thought they should
be based on community consensus, not convincing an architect.
I actually like the formalism a bit - since it at least makes sure
that they don't rot. BDFLs are good.
--
Yuvi Panda T
http://yuvi.in/blog