Well I don't have any experience in RDFa, but looking at the proposal, it
seems like something we should do.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Friesen
<daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com>wrote;wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen
<
daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how
out of date and limited it
is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based
on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/**
Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0<https://www.mediaw…
Is no-one at all interested in RDFa?
No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"?
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [
http://danielfriesen.name/]
______________________________**_________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.…