No subject

For me the more easy would be "Wiccionario" or more spanished : "viccionario".


>The links to Wikipedia for more information are surely a good idea if 
Wikipedia already has an article, but empty redirection would create an 
entirely different set of new problems.  Using your example of "domobot" 
it would make access to Wiktionary's "domobot" more difficult for the 
person who wants to write a dictionary entry for ways.  There are ways 
around it, but I wouldn't expect a newcomer to know that.

For a newcomer would appear : 

"This entry is empty in wiktionary. You can create it or see the encyclopedia article [[en:domobot]].

Talking about languages in wiktionary. It will be dificult  include wiktionary´s versions in another languages. If you include the general wikipedia way do it, one would include

Car : 
[[es:coche]] but it links to wikipedia article, not to spanish wiktionary ( nor one can create it in the future, this way ).

In wiktionary [[es:coche]] would link to  entry "coche" in wiktionary, not to entry "coche" in wikipedia.

Regards.

P.S. : for me it´s more and more difficult enter in www.wikipedia.org ( too much users ??). My web-browser says the server is unreachable.