In one way or in another, you WILL have to reach a consensus before
moving it back to the mainspace, or before deleting the content.
To me this kind of talks *are* AFDs, hence I don't see the point of a
Trivia: namespace, really.
2007/12/31, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Dec 30, 2007 5:32 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 31/12/2007, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Before you go off too far on this idea, I'm
about to float something
on wikien-l about a new "Trivia:" namespace...
If it's encyclopaedic, it should go in the main namespace, if it's
not, it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. Either way, a trivia namespace is
not required.
Trivia is not for non-encyclopedic stuff. It's for stuff about which
notability has not achieved consensus, but which has some claim to
notability.
The same rules would apply there, but instead of AFDing non-notable
stuff, you do an article move to Trivia:Article. It still has to meet
RS, V, NOR, BLP, etc.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Nicolas Dumazet,
Deuxième année ENSIMAG,
VP Comm' Ext' du Cercle des élèves de l'INPG.
06 03 88 92 29