Brion Vibber wrote:
Ben Brockert wrote:
Is there a cogent case for not automatically
fixing double
redirects?
There could be tens of thousands of them, and changing them
automatically may be slow and error-prone. Page moves need to be a
low-cost operation to make and to revert because we're very permissive
about letting people do them.
This is true, but you can still find out what double-redirects there and
enter them in a queue for later scheduled fixing or something...