-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Lee Daniel Crocker schrieb:
Sorry, but I have to make a big-picture comment. The
phase 3 software
was a quick hack, and reasonably effective at getting us over the
bandwidth hump until we could afford to throw more hardware at the
problem. But my impression is that it is still 10-20 times less
efficient than it could be if done right. Good software takes time to
design and build. Might it not be wise to consider starting now to
invest in some development work?
If we're after performance, and want guaranteed vaild X(HT)ML as a side
effect, we (that is, you, Lee:-) should finish Timwi's Bison-based
parser (module "flexbisonparse" in CVS, in case I haven't mentioned it
twenty times yet).
This will require external C, of course. For compatability to those who
cannot do this on their server, we could use my PHP-based wiki-to-xml
converter (at
http://magnusmanske.de/wikipedia/wiki2xml.php ), but it
su**s performance-wise :-(
Magnus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCfMKBCZKBJbEFcz0RAnuxAJ9trnqUctP0l+ULEvKMfyK3bQw2+wCaA+u9
QJ3/TQM/BP+Vn+EihIPsUDg=
=Ty7+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----