[Wikiquality-l] FlaggedRevs UI issue when current=sighted

[P. Birken]

2008/1/31, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> From what I can tell, the current code will still show a link to the
> sighted version, even if current & sighted are fully identical. I
> consider this highly confusing behavior, and I don't really see that
> we can go live with this, even as an experiment.

You're right, I also stumbled upon that. Although I disagree with the
very last point, for the open beta, the current version is completely
OK.

> If not: I would really like us to figure out a solution to this. I do
> believe the situation where a page is current and sighted (and where
> any included templates are unmodified from the sighted state, or have
> been edited by trusted users & auto-reviewed), will be quite common,
> because this is after all the situation we're trying to optimize
> towards. A UI that makes a fully reviewed version look unreviewed
> seems like a major problem to me.

The text still needs some tweaking anyhow. In the case that the
current version is reviewed/sighted, the text tates for IPs: "This is
the latest sighted revision, approved on 1 February 2008. The draft
can be modified; 0 changes await review. (+/-)". This should be
changed to "This is the current version. It is sighted/reviewed,
approved on 1 February 2008.", since the confusing part are the 0
changes awaiting review and it is much shorter. I don't know about the
icon-based case.

For users, the current text is "The latest sighted revision (list all)
was approved  on 1 February 2008. 0 changes need review. (+/-)", which
should be changed to the same: "This is the current version. It is
sighted/reviewed, approved on 1 February 2008." By the way, what is
the reasoning for users and IP seeing different text?

Best,

Philipp