[Wikiquality-l] Flagged Revisions too instrusive

[Bryan Derksen]

Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I'm not too worried. If a popular project really couldn't keep up with
> reviewing in a timely fashion the projects would be saturated with
> vandalism. Flagging should make reviewing more efficient, so we should
> have confidence.

What would really be neat is a variant of special:randompage that only
returns pages whose latest revision is unreviewed. I'm sure there'll be
list pages for that sort of thing but jumping around randomly makes
things seem less like "work" to me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikiquality-l/attachments/20070924/0b47949c/attachment.pgp