[Wikiquality-l] Definition of quality

[Lars Aronsson]

Chad wrote:

> I suppose you can't. It's not exactly like we have an exit 
> survey. However, involving the community in quality feedback 
> would be a double-edged sword.

Involving "the community" is what we're doing today.  But it's the 
people *outside* of our current community that we need to involve, 
and something like an exit survey should be a good tool.  Why did 
you *not* buy a Chrysler?  It seems www.ihatewikipedia.com is 
already owned by some less serious player, but a complaints 
website like that focused on improving Wikipedia (and filtering 
out the noise) could be one way to implement an exit survey.  
This is a part of marketing/outreach rather than technical 
solutions for "stable versions".

My question is if this is part of "Wikimedia Quality" or not?


-- 
  Lars Aronsson (lars at aronsson.se)
  Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se