[Wikipedia-l] Non-notability "abuse"

[Ian Tresman]

At 10:56 29/09/2007, you wrote:
>J.L.W.S. The Special One wrote:
> > My sentiments exactly.
> >
> > 2007/9/22, Ian Tresman <ian2 at knowledge.co.uk>:
> >> At 23:09 21/09/2007, Dan Bolser wrote:
> >>>> There's a big fuzzy
> >>>> middle where we need to begin by assuming that the person posting the
> >>>> information is acting in good faith, and often approaching the content
> >>>> from a different perspecive.  This won't save all the questioned
> >>>> articles, but it may bring peace.  perhaps we should begin treating
> >>>> simple "nn" deletion requests as a breach of good faith.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ec
> >>> That would be nice. I think this is the correct attitude.
> >>
> >> I think people who don't want an article will still claim it is
> >> non-notable... even though editors are acting in good faith, from a
> >> different perspective, or whatever.
> >>
>
>Where would that leave articles like "Joe Black is Eric Black's youngest
>brother." ?


That's a statement. Clearly goes into the article on Eric Black.

Regards,

Ian Tresman
www.plasma-universe.com