[Wikipedia-l] Non-notability "abuse"
daniwo59 at aol.com
daniwo59 at aol.com
Tue Sep 18 14:58:42 UTC 2007
I wanted to avoid this discussion, but I don't think I can, so here goes ...
Given its size, Wikipedia has an enormous responsibility to people
everywhere. While most of us who work on Wikipedia know how to take its content with a
grain of salt, the fact is that the vast majority of people simply turn to
Wikipedia as a first (only?) source of reference. Like it or not, warn against
it or not, for many it is "the" reference--the most accessible source for
reliable information.
This can be dangerous. For instance, putting pet pseudo-scientific theories
on Wikipedia gives them a certan credence that they would not get anywhere
else. Often, those articles will be better sourced than the more conventional,
standard entries on accepted scientific theories. People seeking information,
who are not quite discerning, will turn to the net, see the article, see the
copious references, and come to accept that as normative scientific fact,
when actually the vast majority of scientists may well reject it.
Rather than consider this as hypothesis, it has already happened,
frustrating some of the conventional scientists who edit this site. The debates over
use of the Pseudoscience category tag are very telling in this regard.
Wikipedia's goal is to report, rather than promote ideas. It can, however, happen
that by giving unequal weight to spurious topics, we are doing the latter.
Danny
In a message dated 9/18/2007 10:42:46 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
ian2 at knowledge.co.uk writes:
>I completely fail to see what's so magic in "encyclopedias" that they
>must not list bloggers or actresses. Specially when they are not bound
>by the limits of the paper.
Indeed. There are already encyclopedias on:
Pseudoscience
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_of_Pseudoscience
Star Trek
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Star_Trek_Encyclopedia
Ideas
http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Ideas-Inventions-Concepts-Discoveries/dp/B0
00QRZLTC
African Americans At War
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://www.powells.com/partner/531
/biblio/1576077462=~=Powells
Homicidal Poisonings
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/Pa
raRoute?pid=16143&url=http://www.abebooks.co.uk/abe/BookDetails?bi=891861039
Magical spells
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://newbibliophile.ammonet-serv
ices.com/ibooknet/search?submit=AddAll&bookId=550017&dealerLogin=unclephil&the
_club=ibooknet
World Shopping
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/Pa
raRoute?pid=43&url=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/BookDetails?bi=975949410=~=
Abebooks
Asteroid Names
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/Pa
raRoute?pid=43&url=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/BookDetails?bi=243339144=~=
Abebooks
Singapore Business
http://used.addall.com/SuperRare/url.cgi?=~=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/Pa
raRoute?pid=43&url=http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/BookDetails?bi=962933484=~=
Abebooks
Regards,
Ian Tresman
www.plasma-universe.com
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list