[Wikipedia-l] Non-notability "abuse"

[Ian Tresman]

At 21:58 17/09/2007, you wrote:
>On 9/17/07, Ian Tresman <ian2 at knowledge.co.uk> wrote:
> > The credibility of Velikovsky's ideas have
> > nothing to do with the Pensée series. And
> > Velikovsky never described planetary "billiards".
>
>My grandparents' library had some of his first editions.  I'm using
>one of the modern euphamisms, but I'm intimately familiar with his
>work.  It has no scientific credibility in the modern sense.


But it does not mean that we are unable to describe it, and do so verifiably.

Regards,


Ian Tresman
www.plasma-universe.com