[Wikipedia-l] Notability changes from Jimbo's view
Mark Williamson
node.ue at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 12:05:56 UTC 2007
I think they have eroded in certain areas but stayed very strict in others.
Mark
On 11/03/07, daniwo59 at aol.com <daniwo59 at aol.com> wrote:
>
> No, Verifiability has never been the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia.
> Every branch of McDonalds can be verified by looking them up in phonebooks--that
> does not mean that they are notable and should be included. If anything the
> criteria for notability have eroded somewhat, so that topics that would have
> been deleted on sight are included as a matter of course.
>
> Danny
>
> In a message dated 3/11/2007 9:20:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> it at knowledge.co.uk writes:
>
> In the old days, Jimbo described "Verifiability" as the criteria for
> inclusion in Wikipedia, and this was endorsed by the description of
> "Notability".
>
> Not any more. "Notability" has been redefined as equating
> to: worthiness, "attracting attention", supported by secondary
> sources, popularity, consensus, or perceived truth.
>
> And articles that are not considered "note-worthy", or balderdash,
> are now deleted, rather than described as such.
>
> Is this what Jimbo wants?
>
> Regards,
> Ian Tresman
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
> email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
> http://www.aol.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list