No subject

and unite to defend the right of be-x-old to exist (which I would personally
welcome if the atmosphere was that of a peaceful coexistence). The
Byelorussian language is quite in bad shape and needs all the help it can
get; wars do not help it, that's for sure.

Berto 'd Sera
Personagi dl'ann 2006 per l'arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojaotri)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
 

-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Gray
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:34 PM
To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] New language

On 27/03/07, Berto 'd Sera <albertoserra at ukr.net> wrote:

> This is a bit pessimistic :) The normative Byelorussian wikipedia just was
> created and substituted the old version, the latter was renamed into
> be-x-old.

Is there any chance you could summarise the byelorussian issue for
those of us who haven't been following it? I've got a query about it
and I don't know where to start looking for details...

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l