[Wikipedia-l] school articles : enough

[Steve]

On 1/25/07, David Monniaux <David.Monniaux at free.fr> wrote:
>
> * to lack perspective
> ** give name of personnel who are private persons, which is
> unencyclopedic (ex: there's a teacher called foobar)
> ** devote inordinate length to individual, non notable incidents
> (exemple: some incident because of drunk students at a party 2 years ago)
>
> * to be a magnet for vandalism, from disgruntled or bored students
> ** this vandalism can give details about the personal life of some minors
> ** it often also is demeaning
> ** and sometimes contains outright libel (accusing teachers or
> principals of being pedophiles etc.)
>

Half of me says 'just delete'. The other half says, 'So... protect them from
anonymous/newly created accounts? I know its far from the traditional use of
the tag, but if it really is that rampant the method should be tried.'

-S