[Wikipedia-l] [[WP:100K]] - who here writes well in English and another l...

[Kutahopia at aol.com]

Please help.
 
In a message dated 22-Sep-06 11:05:20 Pacific Daylight Time,  Kutahopia 
writes:

     
 
 
 
I have repetitively attempted to convert to
"digest";  however, it's, ostensibly, stuck.

Thank You.


In a message dated 21-Sep-06 09:23:06 Pacific Daylight Time,  
dgerard at gmail.com writes:

On 21/09/06, Raphael Wiegand <rdb_wikipedia at gmx.de>  wrote:

> Yes, of course it's important to improve  quality, espacially now when
> en: has reached an  unbelievable high number of articles, but I don't
> think  you'll reach 100k of FAs without easing the requirements for  an
> article to be featured, even if you go for it for  three years. Let's
> explain:
> English WP has now  exactly 1118 featured articles on 1,395,220 total


The  current FAC process is known not to scale and is not expected  to
scale, which is why I'm not assuming it. Also, its  requirements have
been deliberately tightened - the Featured  Article Criteria haven't
changed, but the FA process's  expectations have been ramped *way* up
specifically to keep  the numbers down.

(This is about the fourth time I've  said this in this thread, isn't it?)


-  d.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l  mailing list
Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
_http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l_ 
(http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l) 



_wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org_ (mailto:wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org) ,  
_wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org_ (mailto:wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org) 
 
dgerard at gmail.com 
 

 
I have repetitively attempted to convert to
"digest";  however, it's, ostensibly, stuck.

Thank You.


Thank You,

DonFphrnqTaub  Persina
DONFPHRNQTAUB  PERSINA









Thank  You,

DonFphrnqTaub Persina
DONFPHRNQTAUB  PERSINA