[Wikipedia-l] [[WP:100K]] - who here writes well in English and another l...

[Kutahopia at aol.com]

I have repetitively attempted to convert to
"digest"; however,  it's, ostensibly, stuck.

Thank You.


In a message dated 21-Sep-06 09:23:06 Pacific Daylight Time,  
dgerard at gmail.com writes:

On  21/09/06, Raphael Wiegand <rdb_wikipedia at gmx.de>  wrote:

> Yes, of course it's important to improve quality,  espacially now when
> en: has reached an unbelievable high number  of articles, but I don't
> think you'll reach 100k of FAs without  easing the requirements for an
> article to be featured, even if  you go for it for three years. Let's
> explain:
> English WP  has now exactly 1118 featured articles on 1,395,220 total


The  current FAC process is known not to scale and is not expected  to
scale, which is why I'm not assuming it. Also, its requirements  have
been deliberately tightened - the Featured Article Criteria  haven't
changed, but the FA process's expectations have been ramped  *way* up
specifically to keep the numbers down.

(This is about  the fourth time I've said this in this thread, isn't it?)


-  d.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l  mailing list
Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
_http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l_ 
(http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l) 



_wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org_ (mailto:wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org) , 
_wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org_ (mailto:wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org) 
 
dgerard at gmail.com 
 

 
I have repetitively attempted to convert to
"digest"; however,  it's, ostensibly, stuck.

Thank You.


Thank  You,

DonFphrnqTaub Persina
DONFPHRNQTAUB  PERSINA