[Wikipedia-l] Re: An outsider's view on en-admin-only whatever and the rest

[Michael Snow]

Maru Dubshinki wrote:

>On 1/25/06, Delphine Ménard <notafishz at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>On 1/25/06, Maru Dubshinki <marudubshinki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>If the problem is really apparent, why can't you tag the page appropriately?
>>>I don't think adding a new layer of procedure will help anything;
>>>people who already have the time and such will already be working on
>>>the cleanup category.
>>>      
>>>
>>Sure.
>>Let me just take a look...
>>[[Category:NPOV disputes]] 1800 articles tagged.
>>[[Category:Articles which may be biased]] 196 articles tagged
>>[[Category:Accuracy disputes]]  1000 articles tagged
>>[[Category:Pages needing attention]]  198 articles tagged
>>[[Category:Possible copyright violations]] 199 articles tagged
>>
>>Of course, my "urgent request" will be taken care of within the hour.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Delphine
>>--
>>~notafish
>>    
>>
>Why is your urgent request more urgent than all those others?
>  
>
Because, for example, it might deal with a matter that creates potential 
legal liability for the Wikimedia Foundation. Which would make it just a 
little more pressing than the question of what is really known about 
[[Celtic Christianity]].

These are not problems for which "Just tag it and we'll fix it later" is 
an appropriate response. Hence the sarcastic reaction when that response 
is given.

--Michael Snow