[Wikipedia-l] Re: No more new Wikipedias !

[Arbeo M]

--- Anthere <anthere9 at yahoo.com> schrieb:


> I consider the board is not here to micromanage
> things and that natural 
> leaders or natural groups of decision makers should
> appear to make the 
> final decision on whether to open a new language or
> not.
[...]
> But once a project has be agreed upon, I do not see
> the decision of 
> opening one language or not being the job of board
> members, EXCEPT for 
> decision such as whether to work in real languages
> only, or to accept 
> constructed languages, because again, it might be a
> strategic decision. 
> My opinion on the matter is simply that languages
> such as Klington are 
> not welcome. And it seems the other board members
> agree with this.
> 
This surely sounds sensible. A decision not to allow
constructed languages anymore could certainly be
regarded as a strategic decision. Since the board
seems to be unanimous on this matter and the issue
keeps on coming up again and again - causing
unproductive strife each time - wouldn't it make sense
if the board turned this attitude into an official
policy?

Thus, the community would be disburdened from a
controversial issue that obviously is not really
solvable here and concentrate on making the existing
Wikipedias work and starting successful new ones.

Arbeo


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de