[Wikipedia-l] Re: Re: Wikipedia English English

Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 16:00:09 UTC 2005


Ahh, and, in addition, due to some technical mishap, I sent my e-mail
before I received his.

Mark

On 23/09/05, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) I don't call people I disagree with barking mad, unless they really
> are barking mad. I believe this is the first time in a few months I've
> called anyone barking mad, and in the intervening time there have been
> plenty of people with whom I've had disagreements. I think most people
> on this list would agree that Mr Jack and Naree is "barking mad".
>
> 2) Yes, but how many of them? I never said with absolute certainty
> that all of those were BS examples, only that much of the list was BS.
> None of the examples which I made it clear I was fairly certain were
> universal were objected to, and even many of the ones which were
> objected to proved a point, for example "autumn" vs "fall": there's
> one variant that's understood in both places, and another that is only
> understood in one. Which one should be chosen?
>
> 3) Mr. Jack & Naree's most recent message is a bit daft ("looks like
> he failed"). If he had the sense to check, he would see that that
> message was not, in fact, a response to his "troll test" e-mail but
> rather to his earlier e-mail which was written in all-caps. And, if it
> takes two to troll, why is just about everybody else on this list
> calling him a troll? Does that mean that they're all trolls too? And,
> of course, this isn't a response to him, but a note to you which is
> related to but not in response to his message. And if anyone so
> wishes, I invite them to inform Mr Macdaddy that the troll test, from
> now on, applies to him as well: if he IS a troll, he'll make another
> post to this or related threads; if he ISN'T a troll, he won't.
>
> Mark
>
> On 23/09/05, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 23/09/05, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Arguing and trolling is one thing, but writing a response in all-caps
> > > is another.
> >
> > Yes, so much worse than calling somebody you don't agree with "barking
> > mad", only to find that the examples you are objecting to are verified
> > by a number of other users. Hm...
> >
> > --
> > Rowan Collins BSc
> > [IMSoP]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
> --
> SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
> QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
> POSSIT MATERIARI
> ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE
>


--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE



More information about the Wikipedia-l mailing list