[Wikipedia-l] Re: Re: Careless image deletion : a minor outrage

[Mark Williamson]

No, you would not.

You would just need a checkbox similar to the "minor edit" checkbox,
indicating that it was copyvio material.

Mark

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:26:30 +0100 (CET), Alfio Puglisi
<puglisi at arcetri.astro.it> wrote:
> 
> To make #2 work, you need to have two separate deletion tools: one for
> legally-required deletion, and one for generic deletion.
> 
> Alfio
> 
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Mark Williamson wrote:
> 
> >Please reread #2.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:48:06 +0800, Andrew Lih <andrew.lih at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:02:22 -0700, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 1) Since this is a technical issue (isn't it?) shouldn't it have been
> >> > put up for a vote on meta rather than en:?
> >>
> >> Not really a technical issue. The most prominent of the "no" votes
> >> cited legal issues. Anthere put it best:
> >>
> >> "Many of the articles deleted are deleted for a very good reason. Some
> >> because they are copyright violations or libel. These must stay non
> >> visible for obvious legal reasons."
> >>
> >> -Andrew (User:Fuzheado)
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wikipedia-l mailing list
> >Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>