[Wikipedia-l] Re: Request for classical Chinese

[abc_root]

I agree with this idea. Senshin先秦 and kan漢 writings can always be used
as templates and in reality if we could get close to the tou
唐 writings, that is already good enough.

--- Felix Wan <felixwiki at earthsphere.org> からのメッセージ：
> On Wed, March 2, 2005 7:22 pm, shi zhao said:
> >
> > Problem is use when of does the classical Chinese write? Ming and
> Qing?
> > Is Tang Sung period? Or does QIN2 HAN4 is period? Or to is more
> early?
> > Each period classical Chinese differ very greatly.The Manchu
> Dynasty and
> > Han dynasty rise of test twice according to the custom of the
> ancient
> > works, be for can let the then person comprehend the people of the
> past's
> > work of classical Chinese.The ancients is still not
> apprehensibility more
> > early the classical Chinese of the ancients, so which period
> classical
> > Chinese we use to write worthwhile discussion.If use the MIng and
> Qing
> > period classical  Chinese writing, that is much more simple, plus
> some
> > 荵倶ケ手・ケ・ delete 逧・コ・造.( this and Chinese  version
> difference not
> > big)If use first Qin's classical Chinese write, having no several
> > individuals perhaps can write.
> >
> > [[zh:user:shizhao]]
> >
> That is a real concern.  True, even "Classical Chinese" is a blanket
> term covering milleniums of evolving written Chinese style.
> 
> Since the original proposer is a Japanese, I guess the style that is
> most compatible with kanbun or other traditions known to East Asians
> should be that of the Tang-Song period.  That is also the period with
> the richest literature for reference, and most educated Chinese
> should
> be familiar with the style.  So if we are really going to open such
> an
> encyclopedia, let's fix the reference time frame to the Tang-Song
> period.
> 
> However, my perception is that the grammar of Classical Chinese is
> more
> or less stablized since the Tang dynasty.  New ways of saying things
> were introduced, but the real substantial change happens with the
> introduction of Baihuawen.
> 
> Does the Latin Wikipedia face similar problems in selecting the
> style?
> 
> Felix Wan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

__________________________________
Let's Celebrate Together!
Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/