[Wikipedia-l] Re: Why do we have them??

[Mark Williamson]

I can't imagine a relatively sensible bloke like Ray trying to get
Esperanto out of Wiktionary. I'm guessing more like... Klingon,
Lojban...?

Mark

On 27/06/05, Patrick Hall <pathall at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> > Tim Starling wrote:
> >
> > >I think we can put the blame on our use of language code lists which are
> > >biased towards political rather than linguistic divisions.
> > >
> > >
> > An important observation.  In Wiktionary I keep having to beat back the
> > argument that a wide assortment of  conlangs are acceptable because they
> > have been granted a code.
> >
> > Ec
> 
> Which are those, just out of curiosity? (I imagine the list includes
> Esperanto and Volapük?)
> 
> -Patrick
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> 


-- 
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE