[Wikipedia-l] Re: [Wiktionary-l] Article on LISA

[Gerard Meijssen]

Mark Williamson wrote:

>A stupid question, probably, but...
>
>Am I right that UW is to supplement rather than replace existing Wiktionary?
>
>
>  
>
Hoi,
There are no stupid questions. The UW is not to supplement but to 
replace existing the Wiktionaries. The Wiktionaries will be either 
disbanded by the community or they will be left by its users who will 
migrate to the Ultimate Wiktionary. What is the point of keeping a 
Wiktionary when its content is more effectively used in the UW ??

Thanks,
    GerardM

>Mark
>
>On 20/06/05, Sabine Cretella <sabine_cretella at yahoo.it> wrote:
>  
>
>>>Hmmm... :) as a sidenote: wik2dict can now create Debian packages. It
>>>would be cool if someone could offer server space and bandwidth to put
>>>these up.
>>>
>>ow much do you need? I have my own server and up to now I do not use
>>bandwidth and space completely - so it depends on how much it is.
>>
>>It could be easily integrated in the translator's portal for download
>>(www.wesolveitnet.com) - there's already a download part or we cold use
>>a subdomain.
>>    
>>
>>>>Another step is then the data exchangeability with CAT-Tools like
>>>>OmegaT, but that's a story of its own ... if we start to talk about this
>>>>here now ... I am just imagining what would happen ;-)
>>>>
>>> had never heard of CAT (Computer Aided Translation) or OmegaT (GPL'd
>>>Java software). But I do now. :) Well, just inform the folks from
>>>OmegaT. I guess they should be interested in getting this done.
>>>
>>Oh yes, they should be interested - I am in there as well (even if for
>>localisation issues)
>>;-)
>>
>>One step after the other :-)
>>
>>Ciao, Sabine
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>  
>