[Wikipedia-l] culture - recipes and other stuff

[Phil Sandifer]

I agree.  However, I think, when faced with an article consisting 
solely of a recipe, the answer is not, as it historically has been, to 
delete the article or move it to Wikibooks, but rather to write the 
rest of the article.

A recipe article is basically a food stub article.

-Snowspinner

On Jan 22, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Mark Williamson wrote:

> Perhaps. I haven't entirely made up my mind on that.
>
> But I do definitely think that we should have no articles consisting
> solely of a recipe.
>
> Mark
>
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:46:20 -0800, Matt Brown <morven at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:40:51 -0700, Mark Williamson 
>> <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> But the thing with a recipie is that there are infinite 
>>> possibilities,
>>> and different people make it different ways. As I said before, we
>>> should describe what makes it what it is and how it is made, but be
>>> vague enough that we include every possibility for that food. This
>>> isn't a recipie.
>>
>> On the other hand, we can ILLUSTRATE with sample recipes, just as we
>> can illustrate with sample photographs.  Sometimes vagueness is too
>> vague; sometimes what is needed is a specific as an example.  So long
>> as we note that variations do exist and this is just an example, we're
>> fine.  Just as we illustrate, say, an article on Persian cats with a
>> picture of a specific cat; we do have to point out the possible
>> variations and that this is just an example, not the definition.
>>
>> -Matt (User:Morven)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>