[Wikipedia-l] "censorship" On Wikipedia

[Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales]

http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/evidhiv.htm

The number of peer reviewed academic studies cited here is
substantial.  And the conclusions reached by careful scientific
analysis appears to be overwhelming.

"In a Canadian cohort, investigators followed 715 homosexual men for a
median of 8.6 years. Every case of AIDS in this cohort occurred in
individuals who were HIV-seropositive. No AIDS-defining illnesses
occurred in men who remained negative for HIV antibodies, despite the
fact that these individuals had appreciable patterns of illicit drug
use and receptive anal intercourse (Schechter et al. Lancet
1993;341:658)."

I urge everyone to read this page very very carefully before
commenting casually on this issue.  Harry, I especially invite you to
read it and see if it changes your opinion that people are "censoring"
you.

--Jimbo

harry wrote:

> Stirling Newberry states: 
> 
> >There is now a  
> >mountain of evidence that HIV is the necessary, though not always  
> >sufficient, cause of AIDS.  
> 
> Again, the standard for "truth" in science is to publish research in 
> scholarly scientific journal with peer review. Part of the peer review 
> process is to establish whether the research results have been 
> replicated by others. After all isn't that what we are after here - the 
> "truth". Here are picture of the viruses that cause Polio, the Common 
> Cold, and Herpes, http://www.usablemakeover.com/virus_pictures.html 
> 
> 
> So Stirling please cite one study published in a scholarly scientific 
> journal with peer review that states "HIV Is The Probable Cause of 
> AIDS". Is it cited on Wikipedia for me to read? If not where can I find 
> it? At the same time give me one reference to a electron microscopic 
> picture of HIV. 
> 
> 
> - Harry Pasternak 
> 
> 

-- 
"La nèfle est un fruit." - first words of 50,000th article on fr.wikipedia.org