[Wikipedia-l] And now a bit of fun...
kelvSYC
kelvsyc at shaw.ca
Fri Jul 16 05:30:02 UTC 2004
Here's a very unscientific and informal gauge of how great Wikipedia
has become compared to other encyclopedias: the Google fight
(www.googlefight.com). It simply compares Google hits and displays it
in a rather humorous format.
Wikipedia - 11,200,000
Encyclopedia Britannica - 1,670,000
Encyclopaedia Britannica - 1,420,000
Encyclopædia Britannica - 803
Encyclopedia Americana - 94,700
Encyclopaedia Americana - 11,500
Encyclopædia Americana - 88
Encarta - 5,060,000
Microsoft Encarta - 1,070,000
Funk and Wagnalls - 36,400
Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia - 11,300
Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia - 29,000
Grolier's Encyclopedia - 5,920
The Star Trek Encyclopedia - 108,000
Interesting to note that Wikipedia loses against "World Book"
(14,800,000) but not "World Book Encyclopedia" (3,130,000).
For comparison, Wikipedia wins against
Internet Explorer - 10,900,000
The Simpsons - 9,900,000 (the Simpson family member with the highest
score is Lisa Simpson)
iPod - 8,390,000
World Cup - 7,870,000
ESPN - 5,520,000
Warcraft - 3,860,000
Super Bowl - 3,590,000
Slashdot - 3,490,000
National Football League - 2,600,000 (although Wikipedia loses to "NFL"
- 13,300,000)
Pokemon - 2,470,000 (like "Encyclopædia Britannica", you get less
results with the correct spelling of "Pokémon")
Street Fighter - 1,900,000 (speaking of which, Marvel beats Capcom,
which beats SNK)
Starcraft - 1,680,000
Wikipedia tied against SourceForge, and lost embarassingly to football
(42,700,000), Google (59,600,000) and eBay (65,300,000).
As for Wikipedia's dictionary counterpart, Wiktionary loses a lot of
its Google fights...
Wiktionary - 331,000
Oxford English Dictionary - 2,090,000
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language - 1,160,000
New Oxford American Dictionary - 796,000
Concise Oxford Dictionary - 182,000
All data based on results on July 15, 2004.
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list