[Wikipedia-l] Re: Time to set up Wikimedia ProjectCommittees

[Anthere]

Before any type of answer Ec...allow me...

  As we move forward with software and social changes, I think it is 
imperative that I state clearly and forcefully my views on openness and 
the license. This page, like all wikipedia pages, is a living dynamic 
document which I will update and clarify as legitimate questions arise.

I should point out that these are my principles, such that I am the 
final judge of them. This does not mean that I will not listen to you, 
but it does mean that at some ultimate fundamental level, this is how 
wikipedia will be run, period. (But have no fear, as you will see, below.)

1. Wikipedia's success to date is 100% a function of our open community. 
This community will continue to live and breathe and grow only so long 
as those of us who participate in it continue to Do The Right Thing. 
Doing The Right Thing takes many forms, but perhaps most central is the 
preservation of our shared vision for the NPOV and for a culture of 
thoughtful diplomatic honesty.

2. Newcomers are always to be welcomed. There must be no cabal, there 
must be no elites, there must be no hierarchy or structure which gets in 
the way of this openness to newcomers. Any security measures to be 
implemented to protect the community against real vandals (and there are 
real vandals, who are already starting to affect us), should be 
implemented on the model of "strict scrutiny".

"Strict scrutiny" means that any measures instituted for security must 
address a compelling community interest, and must be narrowly tailored 
to achieve that objective and no other.

For example: rather than trust humans to correctly identify "regulars", 
we must use a simple, transparent, and open algorithm, so that people 
are automatically given full privileges once they have been around the 
community for a very short period of time. The process should be 
virtually invisible for newcomers, so that they do not have to do 
anything to start contributing to the community.

3. "You can edit this page right now" is a core guiding check on 
everything that we do. We must respect this principle as sacred.

4. Any changes to the software must be gradual and reversible. We need 
to make sure that any changes contribute positively to the community, as 
ultimately determined by me, in full consultation with the community 
consensus.

5. The GNU FDL license, the openness and _viral_ nature of it, are 
fundamental to the longterm success of the site. Anyone who wants to use 
our content in a closed proprietary manner must be challenged. We must 
adhere very strictly to both the letter and spirit of the license.

6. The mailing list will remain open, well-advertised, and will be 
regarded as the place for meta-discussions about the nature of 
Wikipedia. Very limited meta-discussion of the nature of the Wikipedia 
should be placed on the site itself. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The 
topic of Wikipedia articles should always look outward not inward at the 
Wikipedia itself.

7. Anyone with a beef should be treated with the utmost respect and 
dignity. They should be encouraged constantly to present their problems 
in a constructive way in the open forum of the mailing list. Anyone who 
just bitches without foundation, refusing to join the discussion, I am 
afraid I must simply reject and ignore. Consensus is a partnership 
between interested parties working positively for a common goal. I must 
not let the "squeaky wheel" be greased just for being a jerk.

8. Diplomacy consists of combining honesty and politeness. Both are 
objectively valuable moral principles. Be honest with me, but don't be 
mean to me. Don't misrepresent my views for your own political ends. And 
I'll treat you the same way.