[Wikipedia-l] Re: Developers needed!
anthere9 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 24 12:05:38 UTC 2004
Lars Aronsson a écrit:
> Daniel Mayer wrote:
>>>Looks essentially what a wikispecies should look like, I guess. I guess a
>>>w-species would focus more on the biology, history, genealogy, genetics, or
>>>what, so that it's different from the w-pedia?
>>All that should be covered in the Wikipedia article.
> My impression is that Wikispecies' goal is to catalog *every* existing
> (and extinct?) species. We're talking about, what, hundred thousands
> of articles. This is similar to documenting every town and village,
> no matter what the size, and such attempts have historically not been
> appreciated within Wikipedia. This is why I think Wikispecies should
> be developed separately.
> Consider another hypothetical project: Wikibibliography, that
> catalogs and reviews all books ever printed, which would be something
> like the OCLC WorldCat on an open content basis. Any such project has
> goals that have a rather small overlap with that of Wikipedia.
> However, that overlap (a few thousand articles) might be interesting
> enough that compatible licenses and some coordination could be useful.
I tend to agree with Lars here.
I am interested in such a project, and I think it could have a life on
its own, with some of its information being in wikipedia as well.
I tend to consider Wikipedia as a "generalist" encyclopedia, which
should try to stay simple, readable to most, and avoid jargon and very
specialised information. Wikipedia can be a central reference, with
surrounding projects, smaller, and more specialised.
I still need to see better what this project should be, but I think it
should be separated, but with strong interactions with Wikipedia.
More information about the Wikipedia-l