[Wikipedia-l] Re: New logo and further process

[David Friedland]

Gareth Owen wrote:

> FTJ.  Perhaps we should skip the endless recounts and objections over the
> method, and just ask Jeb Bush to refer the whole matter to the Supreme Court 
> 
> I would like to thank you guys (you will note, this present bunch of pissing
> and moaning is by a group entirely composed of guys) and your ability to
> squabble to excrutiating lengths about what are, in the long run, complete
> irrelevancies for providing me with endless amusement.
> 
> Calm down.  It's just a logo.  
> Go out on the street and ask people what the logo of Encyclopedia Brittanica
> looks like?  Do they even have one?  

> Sometimes this list feels like the lost "B Arc" of the Golgafrinchams.
> Don't you people have telephones to sanitise?

I do care about the logo and submitted a series of calm, considered 
reasons why I think adopting the winner of the logo vote would be a bad 
idea.

If you don't care about the logo, why are you bothering to argue about 
it? Your response seems the most hysterical of any so far. If I don't 
care about an issue being discussed on the lists, I just don't read 
those posts. You should do the same.