[Wikipedia-l] New logo and further process

[Gutza]

tarquin wrote:

> Gutza wrote:
>
>> Yes, thank you. As I said, I am now convinced that logo is 
>> appropriate for this project.
>
> I'm not.
>
> And the whole voting process has been a complete fiasco.
> This "ratification" stuff is pure nonsense -- the WHOLE POINT of this 
> design competition was to have a unified logo across all pedias!
>
> The logo at 33k is innapropriate from a technical standpoint. (#2 is 
> 3k. #3 is 23k
> I would have liked just about any of the other finalists -- we had 
> plenty of *really great* work and I found it hard to pick my absolute 
> favourite.
> But this dirty-looking ball of crud that takes too long to download -- no!


Ok, but what can you do? The voting has been fair (give or take, but the 
overall result can't be contested). That's what people want, what can 
you do? Really, what *can* you do?

Gutza