[Wikipedia-l] Vote on voting method for final round

[Till Westermayer]

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . till we *) . . .

Hi Guillaume,

>From: "Daniel Mayer"
>> Erik wrote:
>>>The Condorcet vote is of no relevance whatsoever.
>>
>> I agree. I've already voted once on this issue and will not vote
>> again via another method. Everyone who is voting via the
>> Condorcet method is wasting their time.

If you look at the history of the page, mav, than you'll see that a
alternative condorcet voting was available almost at the same time then
the fptp voting ...

>Personnaly I think Condorcet method is the more fair method for
>wide vote, but I agree to choose voting system we want for second
>round using FPTP (I fact, imho, "Approval voting" may be better
>here : vote for all method we agree).

I tried to do this, but was edited out.

 __ .
 / / / /                            ... Till Westermayer - till we *)
. .
  . mailto:till at tillwe.de . www.westermayer.de/till/ . icq 320393072
  . Habsburgerstr. 82 . 79104 Freiburg . 0761 55697152 . 0160 96619179
  . . . . .